|
|
| remember, remember the seventh of november |
|
November 7, 2006
|
 |
| the dan brown code |
|
July 21, 2005
|
 |
| to fserve and protect |
|
March 17, 2005
|
 |
| kchung kchungggg |
|
March 27, 2004
|
 |
| you keep using that word... |
|
November 22, 2003
|
 |
| pedro pointed at the sky |
|
October 17, 2003
|
 |
| you filthy pragmatists! |
|
July 29, 2003
|
 |
| the life and times of Reginald the Orc |
|
July 6, 2003
|
 |
| we ruin it twelve ways |
|
June 14, 2003
|
 |
| the scrounging game |
|
March 17, 2003
|
 |
| gotta green before code |
|
November 18, 2002
|
 |
| spatch vs. ants |
|
July 8, 2002
|
 |
| nobody leaves until there's at least 20% on the table |
|
February 14, 2002
|
 |
| send in the clones |
|
August 6, 2001
|
 |
| catzenpoppin |
|
July 8, 2001
|
 |
| some title about Survivor here |
|
May 3, 2001
|
 |
| choose your own damn sugar rush |
|
April 24, 2001
|
 |
| cuckoo for cat chow |
|
December 7, 2000
|
 |
| that's ah-sweep-eh |
|
September 7, 2000
|
 |
| margarita bob, back in town |
|
July 31, 2000
|
 |
| stupid cat tricks |
|
July 17, 2000
|
 |
| eminently predictable |
|
June 28, 2000
|
 |
| maggot-like dinosaur eggs, breakfast of champions |
|
June 22, 2000
|
 |
| blank page |
|
April 3, 2000
|
 |
| eiffel65, leave my head please |
|
March 6, 2000
|
 |
| push(@mattress, $money) |
|
February 11, 2000
|
 |
| pits and bieces |
|
January 8, 2000
|
 |
| Bye Bye Bag |
|
December 22, 1999
|
 |
| Seeing the Elephant |
|
November 10, 1999
|
 |
| k-tel's K-12 hits |
|
October 18, 1999
|
 |
| Me detruisant doucement avec sa chanson |
|
September 10, 1999
|
 |
| Pointless snarky web rantings |
|
September 2, 1999
|
 |
| Vending God memoirs |
|
August 30, 1999
|
 |
| koo koo ka choo, Mrs. Andrews |
|
July 21, 1999
|
 |
| History On Parade |
|
June 17, 1999
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
archives |
|
|
cuckoo for cat chow
Sorry about the delay in writing, folks -- I really
was writing something recently, and it was all snarky and all about
the whole Big Election Brouhaha as, per federal law, all first-person
humorous-type essays must be these days until we finally get ourselves
a President-Elect. Unfortunately, the more I wrote, the snarkier I got,
and the snarkier I got, the angrier I got, and I decided I did not want
to sully my fine homepage with aspersions on Katherine Harris' genetic
lineage (I was guessing everything from German Shepherds to Vietnamese
pot-bellied pigs to rare strains of bacteria) or her sexual proclivities
(once again, guessing everything from German Shepherds to Vietnamese
pot-bellied pigs to rare strains of bacteria.) And while they can't
sue you for libel if it's true, I decided I just couldn't in good conscience
keep the writing up. So *zap* off it went.
And then I realized I had nothing new and I didn't want
to keep the old around as "current" and I really was just
very very tired and wanted to sleep. So, er, I slept for a week and
a half. But boy! Am I rested now! I thank melatonin.
One of the unfortunate side effects of an election year
(and there are so many to choose from) is the inevitable General
Mills cereal tie-in. I'm sure we all remember voting in the 1980s for
the Trix Rabbit to finally get a bowl of Trix. I mean, consider the
1980 election. Reagan, Carter, Anderson, or Give The Rabbit Some Trix.
When presented that way, I believe it's more than easy to see which
way the Will of The People will go. There aren't enough hard-hearted
bastard spawn in this world to deny the Rabbit his tri-colored fruity
wheat puffs. Well, not then, at least.
And remember when the Rabbit finally won and got his
bowl of Trix, and wanted more? Ha! Ha! Should've read the fine
print, stupid bunny! He got a bowl of Trix.
No more, no less. Future legal eagles of America sat up in their beanbags
and took note and we ushered in a new era of Faustian excellence. Thank
you, General Mills.
This year, however, the cereal/democratic process cross-promotion
realizes there might be a surplus of hard-hearted bastard spawn, so
it appeals to a more baser instinct. No, not that one. Checked the back
of a Cocoa Puffs box lately? We get to VOTE! And on what? Let's see
what the box says:
"It's election time and the candidates have each taken a stand
on the future of money. Vote now for your favorite candidate."
Clearly we're not going to get a legitimate response
on what position the candidates are going to fill, and considering we've
got a cartoon donkey and a cartoon elephant and Sonny the Cuckoo Bird
in the running, it's not going to be anything important like President
and CEO of General Mills or anything. (If that were the case I'd have
to vote for Count Chocula 'cause I'm telling you, the man gets the job
done.) Maybe we're dealing with Mayor of Cookieville or something.
I dunno. What I do know is that the FUTURE OF MONEY IS IN (Y)OUR
HANDS, as evidenced by the ballot. Now you take a look here
at the candidates' platforms (shamelessly copied, verbatim, from the
back of the box) and figure out exactly whose side the biased cereal
company is on:
- Donkey, who promises to put his face on every coin
- Elephant, who promises to make his coins BIGGER
- Sonny, who promises to make his coins in real milk chocolate
for you to eat.
Well! No need to add "and a pony of your very own
which you can ride all day", is there? I think it's pretty clear
which candidate kids are gonna choose, unless they all suddenly read
old copies of Ripley's Believe It Or Not! and develop odd fetishes
for 16-pound coins from Madagascar. In fact, I'm pretty sure
General Mills knows this, too, and has co-opted all the gelt they can
find for this purpose. (Sonny's Jewish! Who knew?) It's also pretty
clear from the inherently biased art that Sonny will win
-- he's on a campaign train, surrounded by happy kids holding signs
for him, while the donkey and elephant are off in the distance, running
to catch the train because they've obviously missed out. I have come
to the conclusion that this is a fake election, a sham set up to appease
the populace with promises of chocolate, and merely exploiting the sweet
tooth -- of children, no less -- to achieve their goals. I guess
it could've been worse -- we could've been voting on whether or not
the Cookie Cop finally gets to send the Cookie Crook to the electric
chair.
I'm still scratching my head, though, over what obviously
must be some kind of odd, elusive partisan metaphor in the Donkey and
Elephant platforms. Is General Mills trying to suggest that Democrats
are all vain, Caesar-like creatures, while Republicans are mere size
queens? And the third party candidates are here to eliminate metal coinage
and give you chockies instead? What? What? What?!
I think the saddest thing of all is that I've devoted
way too much time to looking into this promotion. Actually, what's even
sadder is that I'm past the quarter-century mark and I still eat sugary
cocoa cereals. But hey, they're good and the sugar helps you endure
Lengthwise, Not Across, "Boston's Newest and Brightest Morning
Show!" Or whatever they're calling it. Whoo boy, that's perky.
You ain't s'posed to be that perky in the morning, not even with a hum-dinger
of a day ahead.
Recently I noted with perverse glee the odd questionnaire
I found in the box of kitty litter crystals. Well, I'm glad to report
the bag of cat food got jealous and decided to spit out its own little
flyer when I opened the bag. Actually, we found it as I was pouring
the bag into the cat dish -- hey! kids! FREE PRIZE INSIDE! Neither cat
wanted a plastic-wrapped bit of paper, so I took a look.
It's actually an order form for a "Free Purina
Cat Chow 2001 Celebrity Cat Calendar." It includes, not surprisingly,
'original photographs of celebrities with cats'! I'm glad, because original
photographs of celebrities with ferrets would've really ruined the entire
spirit of the project. Various famous people such as Brandi Chastain,
Jimmy Smits, Cheech Marin, Matthew Broderick, and Cal Ripken Jr. are
featured, and I think that's kinda cool. Matthew Broderick likes cats!
Deion Sanders, too! Who knew? The one thing that's not mentioned is
whether or not the cats featured are owned by the celebrities. I would've
been a bit more interested if that were the case; it's very reassuring
to realize that even though Christy Turlington is a famous supermodel
and earns more money than I'll ever see, she's as human as the rest
of us and has to clean the litterbox. From time to time she'll also
wash the whole thing out.
I'd also be curious as to which famous people can't
name a cat to make TS Eliot proud, and thus show off Mr. Whiskers and
Kitty.
The oddest thing, of course, besides the "helpful
cat care information from your Cat Chow Mentors each month" (I
have this amusing mental image of a figure in a hooded robe intoning
"don't give them too much dairy, young acolyte") is the little
questionnaire they make you answer in order to get your free calendar.
No "my cats are substitutes for the children I'll never have"
pop psychology this time, though. This time, through carefully-worded
"Strongly Agree / Agree / Disagree / Strongly Disagree" statements,
we get to Test Our Ability To Correctly Parse Commercials.
To wit:
"I purchase brands that bring out the best in
my cat."
To me, that just says "I listen to cat food slogans whether I actually
realize it or not." Has anybody actually asked their grocer for
that? "Excuse me, which brand will properly bring out the best
in my cat?" Don't people usually ask which brands are on sale this
week or something? Personally, I purchase brands the cats will obligingly
eat and not promptly throw back up. (Poor Abbie has a problem with soft
food that way, though I think it's that he gets excited at actually
having True-Life Meat-Like Product in his bowl, wolfs it down too quickly,
and doesn't give himself a chance to chew properly. I've picked him
up and lectured 25 times on each side, you damn cat! but honestly,
I don't think it's sunk in.)
"When I buy cat/dog food, I prefer to always
buy one brand that I know and trust."
Well, OK, I'll give them that one. Brand loyalty is an important
trait in a consumer and it's wise to figure out who'll be more likely
to switch on you. I do; I buy certain brands, but only because, as mentioned
above, the cats'll eat 'em and not yak 'em.
"Pieces of different colors and sizes tell me
there are different vitamins and minerals in the food."
Oh, now, this one's a hoot and a holler. I mean, really,
this is the only reason I bothered to write about the order form
in the first place, it was that ludicrous. I'm still laughing
as I look at it. I'm abusing the use of italics because of this. You
might as well write "I WILL BUH-LEEV ANYFING U TELLZ ME"
on your forehead in red marker if you answer "Strongly Agree"
to this one. It's a well-known psychological fact that the shapes in
pet food are there to appeal to the humans more than the animals --
I mean, hell, have you ever seen a cat eat a dead animal? Are you going
to try to tell me that very that same cat would turn up its nose at
kitty kibble because it wasn't in fun mousey and fishy shapes? Sure,
to a cat People Food is a big attraction, but what cat is going to associate
a milk bottle with dairy products? Does the cat ever use the milk bottle?
Does milk even come in bottles anymore? I guess not. And the
milk bottle looks way too much like the drumstick for its own good,
I say.
On one hand, it explains to me why certain brands of
cat food are colored the way they are -- burnt umber, mustard yellow,
brick red -- not to provide variety and branding color, but to tell
us stoopid hoominz that hey! This one's got Vitamin D in it, and that
one's got calcium in it for healthy kitty bones! But on the other hand,
I maintain it'd only be all nice and good if the people at Purina ever
put a decoder ring in each bag, since I have absolutely no idea which
color goes with what mineral. And it'd be truly helpful to be able to
tell Martha to be sure to eat all the yellow ones, since she's been
looking kinda logey all day and that's Vitamin C, and -- hey! Aren't
cats colorblind, anyhoo!?
Even so, with one more Secret of Checkerboard Square
out in the open, you still can't convince me they've been having us
on all these years, and put the fishy flavor in the chicken-shaped pieces
and the milk flavor in the fishy-shaped pieces and the chicken flavor
in the squidgy unidentifiable dead thing-shaped pieces. Perhaps it's
an inside joke shared by them and all the cats. Maybe that's why the
cats just sit and stare at us 18 hours out of the day.
With that in mind I'm proud to serve mine monochromatic,
X-shaped cat food. This means Abbie could possibly one day gain intelligence
and learn how to spell words like X++XX and ++X. There's hope for you
yet, mi amigo.
Take care, and don't eat anything you shouldn't.
|